Delhi ITAT allows deduction
u/s. 37(1) to PepsiCo India (assessee) for sponsorship fees paid to ICC during
AY 2009-10; Rejects Revenue’s stand that since the expenditure benefitted other
group entities across the globe, it could not be said to have been incurred
wholly and exclusively for the business of the assessee; ITAT clarifies that
“Benefit factor to other related parties is relevant under transfer pricing
provision and not while allowability of business expense u/s. 37(1)”; Observes
that the commercial expediency was not disputed, further acknowledges that
owing to large viewership of Cricket, advertising on such platforms is common;
Separately, treats subsidy received under West Bengal Incentive Scheme of 2004
as a capital receipt as it was given for the purpose of industrialization of
the State, notes that it was based upon fixed capital investment made by
assessee and only the mode of disbursement was in the form of re-payment of
sales tax paid.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment