CBDT issues final
notification u/s. 115JG(1) specifying the conditions to be fulfilled upon
conversion of Indian Branch of foreign bank into Indian subsidiary company and
also specifying modifications, exceptions, in applicability of certain
provisions of the Act to such conversion; Apart from the conditions specified
in draft notification for availing capital gains exemption that all assets /
liabilities of Indian Branch are taken over by subsidiary, foreign co. receives
consideration only by way of share allotment, foreign co./ its nominees hold
whole of the share capital of the subsidiary, conversion is in accordance with
RBI guidelines, the final notification additionally stipulates that all assets
and liabilities of Indian branch are transferred at book values and any change
in value of assets consequent to their revaluation shall be ignored; Likewise,
the final notification specifies two additional ‘exceptions, modifications and
adaptations’, viz. 1) Sec. 56(2)(x) shall not apply to the transaction of receipt
of shares in the Indian subsidiary company by the foreign company in
consequence of the conversion and 2) the provisions of 35DDA [relating
amortisation of expenditure incurred under VRS] shall be, as far as may be,
apply to the Indian subsidiary company, as they would have applied to the
Indian branch, if the conversion had not taken place; The conditions relating
to unabsorbed depreciation, losses set-off / carry forward, tax credit are
largely similar to those proposed under draft notification; CBDT also amends
Rule 8AA to provide for determination of the holding period for the capital
asset which became the property of the Indian subsidiary co. in consequence to
conversion u/s. 115JG(1), states that the period for which the asset was held
by the Indian branch and by the previous owner [who acquired the capital asset
by a mode referred to in Sec. 49(1) / Sec. 115JG(1)] shall be included
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment