Delhi ITAT holds assessee-individual (transferee) not liable to deduct TDS u/s. 194-IA as the property purchase consideration qua assessee was only Rs. 37.50 lakhs being less than Rs. 50 lakhs threshold prescribed u/s. 194-IA(2), quashes TDS default proceedings u/s. 201(1)/(1A) for AY 2014-15; Assessee had jointly purchased an immovable property with other family members vide single registered sale deed, noting that the total consideration as per sale deed was Rs. 1.5 Cr. (of which assessee’s share was Rs. 37.50 lakhs, being 1/4th un-divided equal share of the property), AO had held assessee in default u/s. 201(1) for not deducting TDS @ 1% as per Sec. 194IA; ITAT holds that Sec. 194-IA (as introduced by Finance Act, 2013) is applicable only with respect to the amount related to each transferee and not with reference to the amount as per sale deed, cites Memorandum explaining Finance Bill, 2013 provisions; States that each transferee is a separate income tax entity therefore, the law has to be applied with reference to each transferee; Since the sale consideration w.r.t. each transferee is less than Rs. 50 lakh, ITAT concludes that Sec. 194-IA was not applicable.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment