Delhi ITAT upholds CIT(A)’s
order disallowing a portion of the conference expenses relating to amount spent
on party and dinner, media event, purchase of expensive watches, jackets,
T-shirts, etc. by assessee (a Law firm) during AY 2010-11; Regarding expenses
on distribution of T-shirts, caps and jackets having assessee firm’s logo on
annual day celebration, ITAT remarks that“nothing is brought on record as how
the distribution of the merchandise among the counsels has served the business
purpose of the assessee firm, which is firm of the Advocates.”, further notes
no evidence of distribution was submitted; Likewise, for dinner / video
coverage expenses in relation to a party hosted to celebrate assessee-firm’s
achievements in which all clients and counsels of the firm along with various
dignitaries were invited, ITAT states that, “The assessee has not brought on
record anything to support that the dinner hosted was for furtherance of the
business interest.”; Also, ITAT disallows sponsorship fee paid by assessee for
the event “PEI India Forum” for enhancing its visibility and recognition, holds
the same was in violation of the Bar Council rules [whereby Indian Law firms
are not allowed to advertise their practice in the market] , thereby triggering
Explanation 1 to Sec. 37; With respect to the expensive watches distributed as
rewards to two employees for their exceptional work, ITAT observes that assessee
did not provide any rationale of watches distribution to only two such
employees:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment