CBDT clarifies
applicability of 'representative assessee' provisions u/s 160 to official
assignees and their classification in the appropriate category of 'person' as
defined u/s 2(31) of the Income-tax Act; States that since official assignees
do not receive income or manage property on behalf of debtor, they cannot be
considered as representative assessee of debtors u/s 160(1)(iii) while
computing tax liability arising from estate of debtors; Further clarifies that
the status of official assignee is that of 'artificial juridical person' as
prescribed u/s 2(31)(vii); Thus states that official assignee is required to
file income-tax return electronically in the ITR Form applicable to 'artificial
juridical person' separately for each of the estate of the insolvent and income
shall be taxed as per the rates applicable to an 'artificial juridical person';
Further, requires official assignee to obtain a separate PAN for each of the
estate of the insolvent
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment