Thursday 26 March 2020

AMENDMENT IN TCS PROVISIONS TO REMOVE CERTAIN AMBIGUITIES




In the Finance Bill, 2020, the provisions relating to TCS were amended to require collection of tax from a person remitting the amount outside India under Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) or buying an overseas tour program package.


LRS is a scheme of RBI which allows a resident individual to freely remit out of India up to USD 2,50,000 per financial year for any permissible current account transaction such as travel, medical treatment, studies abroad, etc.
For this purpose, a new sub-section (1G) was proposed to be inserted in section 206C of the Income-tax Act which requires the collection of tax by an authorised dealer who receives an amount or aggregate amount of Rs. 7 lakh or more during the financial year from a person for remitting such amount out of India under LRS. The tax shall be required to be collected at the rate of 5% of such amount.
In respect of overseas tour program package, it is provided in the said sub-section (1G) that a seller of such package shall be required to collect tax from buyer thereof. The seller shall be required to collect tax at the rate of 5% of the amount received from the buyer.



Further, the Finance Bill, 2020 has proposed to insert a new sub-section (1H) under section 206C to provide for the collection of tax from the sale of goods other than those already covered under TCS provisions.
The Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed by the Lok Sabha) has amended sub-section (1H) to provide that no tax shall be collected in respect of export or import of goods. Further, the following ambiguities in the newly introduced sub-section (1G) of section 206C have been addressed:

1.1.  Clarification as to threshold limit for collection of tax


Liability of an authorised dealer to collect the tax from a person remitting amount out of India under LRS arises only when the amount or aggregate of such amount remitted during the year is Rs. 7 lakh or more. However, it was not specified in the proposed sub-section (1G) that whether authorized dealer shall be required to collect tax on the entire amount or only on the amount in excess of Rs. 7 lakh?
In this respect, a new proviso has been inserted in sub-section (1G)  by the Finance  Bill, 2020 (as passed by Lok Sabha) to provide that tax shall be collected only on the amount in excess of Rs. 7 lakh except where the remittance has been made for overseas tour program package.

1.2.  No threshold limit to apply for collection of tax from foreign currency remitted for the tour package


In case of an overseas tour program package, the seller of such package is required to collect tax from the buyer at the rate of 5% irrespective of the amount he receives from the buyer for such package. Thus, no threshold limit has been proposed where a buyer directly makes payment to the seller of the overseas tour program package. As overseas travel is also covered under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme of RBI, a buyer may make payment to seller indirectly through an authorized dealer. In this situation, the authorized dealer is required to collect tax only when the amount to be remitted out of India is Rs. 7 lakh or more. Whereas, there is no such limit when a buyer makes payment to the seller directly. Thus, buyer’s making payment for overseas travel to a seller through an authorized dealer is at advantage as compared   to buyer’s who makes payment directly to the seller.
To rationalise this situation and make things equal in both the cases, the Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed by the Lok Sabha) amends sub-section (1G) to provide that an authorised dealer shall be required to collect tax from the buyer of overseas tour program package irrespective of the amount to be remitted out of India for that purpose. Thus, authorised dealer shall be required to collect tax even if the amount or aggregate the amounts being remitted by the buyer for the overseas tour package in a financial year is less than Rs. 7 lakh.

As a buyer of an overseas tour program package can make payment in respect of overseas tour package to the seller either directly or through an authorized dealer,  both seller and the authorized dealer may collect tax from the buyer on the same amount which results in the double collection of tax. To remove this ambiguity, a proviso has been inserted under sub-section (1G) by the Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed   by Lok Sabha) to provide that the authorised dealer shall not collect the tax on an amount in respect of which the tax has already been collected by the seller.

1.3.  Tax to be collected at a lower rate if foreign currency is remitted towards loan repayment


The Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed by the Lok Sabha) amends sub-section (1G) to provide for a lower rate of 0.5% for collection of tax by an authorised dealer where the amount being remitted out of India is a loan, which is obtained from a banking company (including any bank or banking institution) or any other financial institution notified by the Central Government for section 80E, for the purpose of pursuing any education.

1.4.  No requirement to collect TCS from export or import of Goods


The Finance Bill, 2020, as introduced in Lok Sabha has proposed to insert a new sub- section (1H) under section 206C to provide for the collection of tax from the sale of goods other than those already covered under any other sub-section of section 206C.
The Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed by the Lok Sabha) has amended the said sub-section (1H) to provide that no tax shall be required to be collected in respect of goods exported out of India and goods imported into India.

1.5.  Deferment of the date of applicability of the amendments made to TCS provisions


The Finance Bill, 2020 has proposed certain amendments to the provisions relating to TCS which were originally proposed to be effective from 01-04-2020.
The Finance Bill, 2020 (as passed by Lok Sabha) has proposed to defer the applicability of such amendments. Now, they will be effective from 01-10-2020.

No comments:

Mumbai Tribunal rules premium received on redemption of debentures is taxable as interest and not “capital gains”

  This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), in the case of Khushaal C. Thackersey  (Taxp...