This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (CESTAT). The issue involved was whether the salary and other benefits paid to the employees seconded from the foreign affiliate can be considered towards receipt of “manpower recruitment or supply agency” services by the assessee.
The key observations of the CESTAT in this regard are as follows:
- On perusal of the Secondment
Agreement entered by the assessee and its foreign affiliate, it is clear
that payment of salaries and other benefits to the secondees is towards
the cost for making services available to the assessee.
- The clauses of the Agreement in
the present case are more or less identical to that of the assessee before
the SC in case of Northern Operating System (NOS). Therefore, assessee
cannot escape the service tax liability in respect of such services under
reverse charge mechanism.
- There is no doubt that what is
provided by foreign affiliate is nothing but manpower recruitment
services.
- However, since all the
activities were within the knowledge of the Revenue in view of the several
audits undertaken during the relevant period, there is no scope to allege
suppression of facts.
Basis above, CESTAT upheld service tax
demand on amounts paid to foreign expatriates towards “manpower recruitment or
supply agency” services by the foreign affiliates. However, demand for the
extended period of limitation was set aside.
Comments
- While the CESTAT concluded on
similarity in facts of present case with the matter in NOS before SC, in
the said case, the entire salary and other benefits were paid by the
foreign affiliate to the seconded employee which were reimbursed by the
Indian company.
- Another key parameter of
cross-service arrangement between the entities that was present in NOS
case before SC is however not there in the present appeal.
- Earlier, even the Bangalore
CESTAT [2023-TIOL-295-CESTAT-BANG] in case of Dell International upheld
the taxability on similar arrangement following the SC ruling in NOS.
- It is pertinent to note that
similar issue pertaining to taxability of secondment is pending before the
SC in two other cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment