Saturday 21 October 2023

Recent ITAT Judgements.

 

·       Mumbai ITAT upholds penalty under black money law for non-disclosure of foreign assets in tax return

 

·       Mumbai ITAT in the case of Aruna Chandak held that Provisions of Sec 56(2)(vii)(C) are not applicable in the case of bonus shares.

 

·       Mumbai ITAT in the case of TCS held that there is no need to charge brand royalty from AEs.

 

·       Mumbai ITAT in the case of Total energies marketing held that ESOP is taxable in the hands of employees not at the time of grant of ESOP but at the time of vesting ESOP rights.

 

·       In the case of Subash Tandon v/s ITO, Delhi [ITA No. 1382/Del/2023], Delhi Tribunal held that amount received on redemption of Unit Linked Insurance Plan [ULIP] is taxed under the head “Income from Capital Gains” instead of taxing gross receipts under the head “Income from Other Sources” on the reasoning that ULIP is linked to the units of mutual fund allotted to the assessee in respect of money paid by him. Further, reference is also made to section 45(1B) of the Income-tax Act which also states that receipts from ULIP is taxed under “Income from Capital Gains”.     

 

·       ITAT Delhi in the case of LIFESTYLE PROBUILD PVT. LTD held that prescribed method for unquoted shares is not any specific method but it provides that assessee may obtain valuation report from merchant banker or accountant. In this case the assessee has obtained valuation report of the accountant. To this extent, valuation adopted by the assessee cannot be said to be not in accordance with law.

 

·       Bangalore ITAT in the case of Knowledge hut solutions held that TDS to be deducted only on commission charges and not on gateway charges.

 

·       Jaipur ITAT in the case of Mangalam Art held that Interest paid on TDS is compensatory in nature and is a business expenditure allowable u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax.   

  

·       The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount paid to the retiring partner in terms of settlement arrived at between two partners for giving up his interest in the partnership firm is a capital expenditure. 

No comments:

Karnataka High Court ruling - International Worker provisions under the Provident Fund law held to be unconstitutional and arbitrary

  On 25 April 2024, the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka delivered a judgement (W.P. No.18486/2012 and others) striking down the special prov...