This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) to decide whether the majority ruling of nine-judge bench of SC in case of Mineral Area Development Authority vs. Steel Authority of India (MADA) should be given prospective effect.
SC in the above case had earlier upheld the power of States to impose taxes on
mineral rights. Subsequently, the question arose whether the judgement should
apply prospectively or retrospectively.
SC observed that if MADA is given a prospective effect, the validity of all
relevant legislation enacted before the date of the decision will have to be
tested on the touchstone of the previous law which was unsettled because of the
conflicting decisions. Since MADA has resolved the conflict, it should be
applied retrospectively.
Further, bearing in mind the consequences that would emanate from the past
period, SC directed following conditionalities to prevail:
- The demand of
tax on mineral rights by States shall not operate on transactions made
prior to 1 April 2005;
- The time for
payment of the demand shall be staggered in instalments over a period of
twelve years commencing from 1 April 2026; and
- The levy of
interest and penalty on demands made for the period before 25 July 2024
shall stand waived for all the assessees.
Comments
- While the Supreme Court upheld
the power of States to levy tax on mineral rights, restricting the power
to recover the same only from 1 April 2005 along with waiver of interest
and penalty may lower the burden on the concerned industries.
- Allowing staggered payment over
a period of 12 years is likely to ease the working capital issue for such
businesses.
- Taxpayers may have to evaluate
whether the SC judgement upholding the State’s power to levy tax on
mineral rights has any bearing on the royalty charged under Section 6A of
Oilfields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948.
No comments:
Post a Comment