Background:
1. MLI coming into force: On October 1st, 2019, the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, otherwise referred to as the Multilateral Instrument or MLI, came into force.
2. BEPS Action Plan:OECD’s
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan 6 - recommended the introduction
of one or more of the following three treaty provisions, as a minimum standard
to address treaty abuse:
(a)
The Principal Purpose Test (“PPT”) only, which
is a general anti-abuse rule based on the principal purpose of transactions or
arrangements;
(b)
A PPT supplemented with either a simplified or a
detailed LOB provision; or
(c)
A detailed LOB provision, supplemented by a
mutually negotiated mechanism to deal with conduit arrangements not already
dealt with in tax treaties.
1.
Taxing capital gains: India had amended its tax treaties with
Mauritius, Singapore and Cyprus to allocate India the right to tax capital
gains arising on transfer of equity shares acquired after April 1, 2017.
Acquisitions prior to April 1, 2017, were grandfathered from capital gains tax
in India.
2.
Introduction of PPT in the treaties: With
introduction of PPT in such tax treaties pursuant to MLI or bilateral
negotiation (in case of Mauritius), it was not clear whether the muster of PPT
will have to be satisfied even in cases of grandfathered transactions.
CBDT clarification: With this background, CBDT issued a clarification vide
circular 1/2025.
1. PPT
should be applied prospectively in the following cases:
* Tax treaties (like Chile, China, Iran,
Hongkong) in which PPT was negotiated bilaterally – PPT should apply from date
of entry into force of the tax treaty or the amending protocol incorporating
PPT
* Tax treaties in which PPT has been
incorporated through the MLI – the entry into effect of the PPT would depend on
when the contracting state deposits the instrument for ratification. For tax
treaty partners who have deposited the instrument of ratification before June
30, 2019, PPT will be applicable from FY 2020-21.
2. Singapore,
Mauritius and Cyprus: With respect to treaty specific bilateral commitments in
form of grandfathering provisions under the India-Singapore, India-Mauritius
and India-Cyprus tax treaty, it has been explicitly clarified that such
provisions are not intended to interact with PPT.
3.
Case by case basis: The clarification also
provides that PPT provision is expected to be a context-specific fact-based
exercise, to be carried out on a case-by-case basis, keeping in view the
objective facts and findings.
Note: While
Mauritius has not ratified the India-Mauritius tax treaty as a CTA, the tax
department has nevertheless included Mauritius treaty in this clarification.
This may be because of the 2024 protocol which proposed addition of PPT to the
Mauritius tax treaty as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment