The 56th Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council Meeting, held in September 2025, represents a significant stride towards simplifying India's GST system. The recommendations from this pivotal meeting address several key areas, aiming to reduce litigation, improve compliance, enhance affordability, and strengthen institutional mechanisms.
Rate Rationalisation: A Streamlined Structure One of the most impactful
recommendations is the consolidation of the multiple existing GST slabs
(5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%) into three broad categories. These new categories are:
• Merit Rate: 5% for essential goods and services.
• Standard Rate: 18% for most goods and services.
• Demerit Rate: 40% for sin goods, coupled with a
compensation cess.
This restructuring is designed to simplify the tax
framework, minimise classification disputes, and align Indian GST practices
with international VAT/GST principles, particularly those of neutrality and
simplicity as espoused by the OECD. The Supreme Court, in cases like Union
of India v. Mohit Minerals and Abbott Healthcare v. Commissioner of
Sales Tax, Kerala, has previously highlighted the necessity of clarity in
tax levy to prevent double taxation and prolonged disputes stemming from
multiple rate classifications. The Council’s recommendations, as reaffirmed by
the High Court of Gujarat in State of Gujarat v. Reliance Industries,
hold binding value in rate fixation. The expected impact includes overall
simplification of the GST regime, improved compliance, and a reduction in
litigation.
Safeguarding Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) The Council has also taken steps to safeguard
transitional ITC rights under Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST Act during
rate changes. This decision is supported by Supreme Court judgments, such as Filco
Trade Centre, which held that transitional ITC is a vested right that
cannot be arbitrarily denied, and ALD Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. CTO, where
ITC was recognised as a substantive right forming part of a taxpayer’s capital.
Clarificatory circulars are also expected to guide refund treatment in inverted
duty cases. This measure aims to ensure a smooth transition for taxpayers,
protect credit entitlements, and reduce disputes.
Operationalising GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) To strengthen appellate remedies and
expedite dispute resolution, the Council decided to operationalise GSTAT
benches across India. Established under Section 109 of the CGST Act, GSTAT
will provide taxpayers with effective appellate remedies. The Supreme Court, in
cases like Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank and Madras Bar
Association v. Union of India, has emphasised the importance of tribunal
independence and respecting judicial independence in appointments. GSTAT is
anticipated to reduce the burden on High Courts, provide faster
resolution of disputes, and build taxpayer confidence.
Valuation and Procedural Reforms Significant procedural reforms
include an amendment to Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act to align
intermediary service taxation with the consumption principle. This addresses
criticisms, such as those from the Bombay High Court in Material Recycling
Association of India v. Union of India, regarding the artificial taxation
of intermediaries. Additionally, Section 15(3) of the CGST Act will be
simplified to allow genuine post-sale discounts to be excluded from taxable
value, even if not pre-agreed. The Supreme Court in CCE v. Southern Motors
supported the exclusion of genuine commercial discounts if they are not
mechanisms for tax evasion. These reforms seek to harmonise Indian GST with
global practices, provide clearer rules for cross-border transactions and
discounts, and reduce unnecessary disputes.
Sector-Specific Rate Relief and Refunds The Council announced rate
reductions for specific sectors under Section 11 of the CGST Act, which
permits exemptions in public interest. Key reliefs include:
• Nil GST on paneer and UHT milk for Agriculture &
Dairy.
• 5% GST on soaps and bicycles for MSME/Consumer
Goods.
• 18% GST on small cars, air conditioners, and
televisions for Auto & Electronics.
• Nil/5% GST on critical goods for Medical &
Healthcare. These reductions aim to enhance affordability, support MSMEs, and
strengthen healthcare access, providing relief for consumers, growth for small
businesses, and cheaper healthcare essentials.
Furthermore, the refund mechanism for accumulated ITC under
Section 54(3) of the CGST Act will be streamlined. It will now include
specified input categories, with simplified filing and processing. This
decision balances legislative intent with taxpayer relief, acknowledging
Supreme Court rulings such as VKC Footsteps v. UOI which upheld
restrictions on input service credits, while also considering judgments like Triveni
Engineering v. UOI by the Allahabad High Court, which directed refund
processing even when circulars attempted to restrict entitlement. The expected
impact is quicker refunds, greater clarity for taxpayers, and fewer disputes.
Sin Goods and Compensation Cess: RSP-Based Levy For products like tobacco, pan
masala, and gutkha, the Council shifted to a Retail Sale Price (RSP)-based
levy under the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. These goods will
continue to attract a 40% demerit rate plus cess. This move aims to address
valuation complexities observed in the tobacco sector, as noted by the Supreme
Court in ITC Ltd. v. CCE, by ensuring uniformity. While this is expected
to bring transparency and uniformity in valuation and stable revenue, high
rates may also risk smuggling and black-market trade if not supported by strong
enforcement.
Conclusion The 56th GST Council Meeting marks a comprehensive effort
to streamline and strengthen India’s GST system. The
recommendations—encompassing rate rationalisation, protection of transitional
ITC, operationalisation of GSTAT, valuation and procedural reforms,
sector-specific relief, clarification of refunds, and RSP-based levy on sin
goods—are largely consistent with global VAT/GST practices. These reforms are
anticipated to lead to a significant reduction in litigation, improved
compliance, enhanced affordability for consumers, and robust institutional
mechanisms for dispute resolution
No comments:
Post a Comment