The Lok Sabha has passed the Taxation & Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 (‘Amendment Bill’). The said Amendment Bill replaces the Income-tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026 which was earlier passed on 5 June 2026 and also proposes other amendments to the Income-tax Act, 2025 (‘the Act’), the most notable amendment being in respect of taxation of unitholders and SPVs of business trusts.
Existing provisions - Taxation of dividend income distributed
by business trusts
• Currently,
under the provisions of the Act, dividend income received by a business trust
i.e., an Infrastructure Investment Trust (‘InvIT’) or a Real Estate Investment
Trust (‘REIT’) from its investment in Special Purpose Vehicle (‘SPV’) is exempt
from tax at the level of the business
trust. However, the taxability of such dividend
income distributed by the business trust to its unitholders is dependent upon
the tax regime opted by the underlying SPV as under:
i.
Where the SPV has not opted for the concessional tax regime under section 200 of the Act - Dividend
income is exempt in the hands of the unitholders
ii.
Where the SPV has opted for the
concessional tax regime under section 200 the Act (viz. 22% tax rate) -
Dividend income is taxable in the
hands of the unitholders as such.
Proposed relief for unitholders
• The
Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 proposes that dividend income
distributed by a business trust to its unitholders would be exempt from tax
irrespective of whether the underlying SPV has opted for the concessional tax
regime under section 200 of the Act.
• The
proposed amendment seeks to simplify and rationalize the taxation of business
trust distributions by providing a
uniform tax exemption for dividend income received by unitholders,
thereby eliminating the distinction based on the tax regime adopted by the
underlying SPV.
Enhanced Surcharge Rate for SPVs opting for concessional tax regime
• To
neutralize the revenue impact, the Amendment Bill seeks to levy an additional surcharge of 15% on SPVs of
business trusts that have opted for the concessional tax regime under section 200 or
section 201 of the Act, as compared
to the currently applicable 10% surcharge.
• Below
table summarises the impact on the effective tax rate for SPVs of business
trusts as a result of the amendment:
|
SPV of Business Trust |
Pre-Amendment |
Post-Amendment |
|
Opted for concessional tax regime under
section 200 of the Act |
25.17%
(Base rate 22% +
Surcharge 10%+ Cess 4%) |
28.6%
(Base rate 22% + Surcharge 25%+ Cess 4%) |
|
Opted
for concessional tax regime under section 201 of the Act |
17.16%
(Base rate 15% +
Surcharge 10%+ Cess 4%) |
19.5%
(Base rate 15% + Surcharge 25%+ Cess 4%) |
|
Not opted for concessional
tax regime |
34.944%
(Base rate 30% + Surcharge 12%+ Cess 4%) |
34.944% No change proposed |
Rationale for the amendments relating to taxation
of unitholders and SPVs of business trusts
• Following
the Union Finance Minister's announcement that no fresh MAT credit would accrue
from FY 2026-27 onwards and that MAT would effectively become a final tax liability,
companies remaining under the old
tax regime would continue to be subject to MAT but would
no longer generate MAT credit for future set-off. At the same time, companies
migrating to the concessional tax regime from FY 2026-27 onwards were permitted
to utilize MAT credit accumulated up to 31 March 2026.
• Given
that many SPVs, particularly in infrastructure and real estate sectors, possess substantial MAT credit balances arising from accelerated
depreciation and other timing differences, the concessional tax regime became
increasingly attractive.
• However,
dividend income distributed by a business trust to its unitholders was exempt only if
the underlying SPV remained under
the regular old tax regime.
Where the SPV opted for the concessional regime under section 200
(erstwhile section 115BAA), such dividend became taxable in unitholders' hands.
• Thus,
opting for the concessional regime by the SPV would result in the loss of
dividend tax exemption for unitholders, thereby creating a conflict between
preserving SPV-level tax benefits and maintaining investor-level tax
efficiency.
• The
Amendment Bill resolves this conflict by proposing amendments to make dividend income
exempt in unitholders' hands regardless of the SPV's tax regime.
• Further,
to offset the resulting loss arising to the Government, the Bill proposes
raising the surcharge on SPVs under the concessional regime from 10% to 25%, effectively shifting the tax cost
from investors to the SPVs.
Other Amendments proposed by the Amendment
Bill
• Exemption in respect of income of foreign company
arising on account
of providing capital goods,
equipment or tooling equipment to a resident contract
manufacturer producing electronic goods
-
The exemption has been extended
from up to tax
year 2030-31 to until tax year
2040-41
-
The exemption shall
be available in respect of specified electronic goods being mobile phones,
laptops, all-in-one personal
computers and tablets,
servers and ultra small form
factor (USFF) and sub-assemblies, hearables, wearables and accessories to the
above finished goods.
• New
exemption proposed for foreign company on income accruing on account of storage of components in a warehouse
in a custom bonded area for provided
them to a contract manufacturer to be used for manufacturing of above
specified electronic goods.
• Exemption in respect of income of foreign company
arising on account
of procuring data centre
services from specified data centre owned and operated by Indian company
-
The condition for notification of foreign company
by Central Government to be eligible for
the exemption has been deleted
-
The condition for notification of the specified data centre by Central Government (Ministry of Electronics and
Information Technology) has also been deleted
-
The data centre could
be owned or be operated
on lease basis by the
Indian
company
• New
exemption proposed for foreign mining company engaged in the business of
selling rough diamonds or a foreign company functioning as a sight holder, broker, aggregator or a tender
and auction entity
for such business
for a period of 15 years
viz. up to 31 March 2041.
• Additionally,
the conditions for safe harbour for eligible investment funds from constituting business
connection in India where the fund management activity is carried
out through an eligible fund manager in India have been relaxed.
Remarks
• The amendments in respect of business trusts
shall ensure that SPVs of business
trusts will be able to move to the
concessional tax regime and preserve their MAT
credit without unitholders losing the dividend exemption.
• The loss to the Revenue will be absorbed
at the SPV level via higher surcharge rather than passed on to
investors.
• Further,
since dividend income distributed by a business trust would stand exempt under
domestic law itself, the need to rely on tax treaty protection would no longer
arise. Consequently, issues surrounding a non-resident unitholder's eligibility
to claim treaty benefits including satisfaction of conditions such as beneficial ownership and limitation of benefits as well as questions relating to the
characterization of such income for treaty purposes, would become largely
academic once the proposed amendment is enacted.
• The
proposed amendments in respect of taxation of unitholders of business trusts
may especially be relevant for HNIs and family offices
considering that many of
them have exposures to business trusts as part of their portfolio.
• The
other amendments proposed are intended to further incentive the emerging
sectors and provide more certainty and longevity from tax perspective,
No comments:
Post a Comment