๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฅin the case of Mohan Rajashekhar ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ฌ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐๐๐ญ ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ก ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
๐๐๐๐ค๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐:
1. The taxpayer, an individual, sold 13,770 shares of a company in which he was a promoter for ~INR 25 crore.
2. While computing capital gains, he claimed deduction of ~INR 1.5 crore paid as success fee to a transaction advisor for identifying investors, negotiating terms, coordinating due diligence and facilitating the transaction.
3. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction.
๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐๐ก๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐?
๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐'๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ:
1. Engagement letter was between advisor and company (whose shares were sold), not the taxpayer in his individual capacity, and it was addressed to him only in his capacity as Chairman/Director.
2. Also, the buyer confirmed that no intermediary or agent was involved.
Therefore, Success fee had no direct nexus with taxpayer's transfer of shares.
๐๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ฒ๐๐ซ'๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ:
1. Advisory services were directly connected with the sale of his shareholding.
2. Taxpayer furnished engagement letter, invoices, confirmations and correspondence evidencing the advisor's role.
3. Advisor acted as transaction consultant, not a broker or agent, and the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the share transfer.
๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐:
1. Substance of the engagement was the promoter’s divestment of shareholding.
2. Advisory services had a direct nexus with the share transfer.
3. Buyer's statement that no intermediary was involved did not negate the advisor's role as a consultant. Advisor confirmed that fee was for services relating to the taxpayer's share sale.
4. Success fee invoice was raised on, and paid by, the taxpayer from his personal bank account.
5. Success fee qualified for deduction as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer.
No comments:
Post a Comment