CST vs. Krishna Communications - 2013 (31) STR -285 (Tri.-Ahmd)
Facts:
The respondents providing advertising service were duly registered with the department and discharged service tax liability as and when the payments were received. The amount already billed but subsequently found irrecoverable, were written off by it as bad debts.
Held:
Observing that there cannot be one-to-one co- relation for availing and utilising CENVAT credit of input services with provision of output service, the Hon. Tribunal held that the reasoning of the first
No comments:
Post a Comment