A company, followed, the mercantile system of
accounting in accordance with s. 209(3) of the Companies Act, 1956,
according to which the profits were Rs. 7.48 crores. However, for income tax
purposes, it followed the cash system of accounting according to which the
profits were Rs. 4.76 crores and offered that sum to tax. The Assessing Officer
rejected the claim on the ground that u/s 209(3) of the Co’s Act, a company is
obliged to follow the mercantile system and that is its’ “regular
method” for purposes of s. 145. However, the CIT (A) upheld the assessee’s
claim. On appeal by the department,
HELD upholding the assessee’s plea:
As reported by ITAT.ORG: The assessee has regularly employed the cash system
of accounting in recording its day today business transactions. It is
not a case where the assessee has been maintaining its accounts of day to day
business under the mercantile system of accounting and thereafter prepares
accounts in accordance with cash system of accounting for income tax
purposes. Section 209(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 does
not override s. 145 of the Income-tax Act. There was also no valid
basis for the AO’s action in rejecting the books of account and system of
accounting followed by the assessee. Further, since the department has accepted
the assessee’s system for the past several years, the principles of
consistency apply and there should be finality and certainty in
litigation in the absence of fresh facts to show that the assessee’s system of
accounting is arbitrary or perverse (Amarpali Mercantile 45 ITD
386 (Del) distinguished, Chennai Finance 81 ITD 7 (Hyd)
followed).
No comments:
Post a Comment