HC
holds that Joint Commissioner (Executive) (JC) is empowered to exercise
revisional powers comprised under Section 10B of U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948;
Rejects assessee’s plea that no notification has been issued by State
Government conferring such authority, acts and decisions of JC cannot be
validated or saved by application of “de facto” doctrine, hence exercise of
power by JC was invalid, liable to be viewed as a mere usurper of office;
Observes, a careful reading of Section 10B clearly establish that initially the
provision empowered the Commissioner or such other officer not below the rank
of Deputy Commissioner to exercise powers of revision and later words “Deputy
Commissioner” was substituted by words “Joint Commissioner”; States, fact that
Commissioner did not require separate authorisation by State Government or a
notification/authorization is evident from a plain construct of Section 10B
and once Section 2(b) mandates recognition and inclusion of Joint Commissioner
in expression “Commissioner”, there is, no requirement of separate
authorisation/notification of conferment of such authority; Remarks, “The
classification or the description of different categories in the Rules framed
under the 1948 Act clearly can neither control nor be determinative of the
authority which may exercise powers under Section 10B”, accordingly, dismisses
assessee’s revision petitions : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment