Bengaluru ITAT directs
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (‘assessee’) to pay Rs. 5 Cr on or before January
31, 2018 and retain balance of another 20% (rounded off to Rs. 10 cr.) as
balance in its bank account while granting stay for 3 months for balance amount;
Firstly, ITAT holds that there is no ‘prima facie’ case in favour of the
assessee as the issue involved in appeal (i.e. TDS applicability on
interconnect charges payment to foreign carriers) is covered against the
assessee by earlier year order in assessee’s own case; Next, ITAT relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Google India Private Ltd. wherein it was held that
for granting stay, payment of 55% of disputed demand and retaining balance of
another 20% of disputed demand in assessee’s bank account is just & proper
condition; Further, ITAT rejects giving much importance to the rectification
application filed by assessee (which according to assessee would reduce the
total demand for subject AY to Rs.34.66 cr.) as such application was
filed by assessee just a day prior to filing stay application and therefore,
could not be considered by AO, moreover, ITAT observes that assessee did not
demonstrate any ‘financial hardship’, cites SC ruling in Dunlop India
Ltd.; Noting that on payment of Rs.5 cr., the total payment against the
outstanding demand comes to 42.5% of the total disputed demand of Rs.47.05 Cr
(and about 57.7% if rectification application is allowed), ITAT directs Revenue
not to enforce recovery of the demand subject to assessee meeting the aforesaid
twin conditions:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment