Tuesday, 23 January 2018

ITAT : Grants relief to builders consortium; No transfer absent agreement registration, applies Balbir Singh (SC)

Delhi ITAT rules that amount received by the assessees (who have formed a consortium for the purpose integrated township development) on account of transfer of development rights in the underlying land during AY 2008-09, not chargeable to tax u/s. 2(47)(v), being not accrued to assessees in subject AY; ITAT notes that assessees have entered into agreement for the development of integrated township in February, 2007 with the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA)  which had also agreed to provide assistance in acquisition of land other than the land owned by the consortium parties so as to complete 72.9 acres; ITAT further notes that the consortium parties entered into a shareholders’ agreement with a financial partner on 18th May 2007to form SPV and under the shareholders agreement, the assessees’ land and development rights together were valued at Rs. 103.45 crores, which were paid 60% in cash and 40% in terms of equity shares / debentures and land was vested in SPV; Rejects Revenue’s stand that since the possession of land was handed over by assessees to the SPV, it amounted to transfer in terms of section 2(47)(v), observes that the  shareholders agreement was not registered which is the condition precedent to give effect to Sec. 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, applies the ratio laid down by SC in case of Balbir Singh Maini; Further notes that the consortium parties were under obligation to provide the developed land along with necessary approvals and permissions from the concerned competent authorities and in case they failed to provide the agreed FSI, then the consortium parties would not be allowed to withdraw their amounts fixed under the agreement, thus ITAT holds that “unless and until the approvals and permissions are granted by GDA, it cannot be said that any income accrued to the appellants.”: ITAT accepts assessees’ stand that as and when the approvals would be granted in subsequent years, the proportionate amount out of the advance so received under the shareholders agreement shall be offered to tax:ITAT 

No comments:

Can GST Under RCM Not Charged and Paid from FY 2017-18 to October 2024 be Settled in FY 2024-25?

 In a recent and significant update to GST regulations, registered persons in India can now clear unpaid Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liab...