Mumbai ITAT deletes
addition u/s. 41(1) [on account of cessation of trading liability] in case
assessee-company (engaged in engineering, designing services for oil & gas
industry) with respect to outstanding commission payable to its agent in Kuwait
(‘creditor’) for AY 2011-12; ITAT notes that assessee had entered into
MoU with the creditor for procuring business for assessee in Kuwait, noting
that the creditor did not make any request for clearance of commission of
Rs. 34.90 lakhs outstanding for more than 1460 days, AO made addition u/s.
41(1) treating it as liability ceased; Rejecting Revenue’s action, ITAT notes
that under the MoU, commission was payable only on realization of proceeds from
customers procured by agent, thus observes that the commission payable was
outstanding as the agent could not recover sales proceeds from customer;
Holds that by withholding commission payments of agent with respect to overdue
payment from its debtors, assessee has acted in a manner consistent with
principles of commercial expediency and in accordance with the terms of MOU,
thus remarks that “ … Revenue cannot direct assessee to act in a manner in
defiance to the principles of commercial expediency and in turn to damage its
own business interest.”; Observes that assessee had also produced details
of court cases at Kuwait and correspondences with its overseas buyers/agents
with respect to its efforts for making recovery etc. to justify that the
payments were still due from the customers:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment