Kolkata ITAT allows Sec.
10AA benefit to assessee in respect of international trading, warehousing and
consultancy income for AY 2009-10; ITAT acknowledges that trading activity
is not expressly covered u/s 10AA, but observes that as per the Special
Economic Zone Act, 2005 (SEZ Act) and its Rules, 2006, definition of
‘service’ included trading activity; Rejects Revenue’s stand that the
‘service’ definition as specified in SEZ Act cannot be imported for the purpose
of the income tax, referring to Sec. 51(1) of the SEZ Act, ITAT holds that “the
provisions as specified under the SEZ Act, 2005 would have overriding effect on
the Income Tax Act because SEZ Act is a Special Act and a later Act of the
Parliament.”, relies on co-ordinate bench ruling in assessee’s own case of
earlier year; Likewise, notes that the definition of ‘service’ under SEZ rules
include ‘warehousing activity’ also, therefore holds that the warehousing
income qualifies for exemption u/s. 10AA on the same reasoning as that given
for trading activity; Further, notes that consultancy services
rendered by assessee were intrinsically linked to the normal import-export activity
carried on by assessee and the same are covered under the head ‘other business
service’ of SEZ Rules by applying ejusdem generis:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment