Monday, 25 June 2018

HC : Upholds addition based on 'window-dressed' financials prepared for availing bank loan

Calcutta HC dismisses assessee’s appeal with costs for AY 2005-06, confirms addition based on the balance-sheet and P&L account prepared for availing bank loan and certified by Chartered Accountant in Form 3CB; Observes that the figures in audit report in Form 3CB (issued in July, 2005) were at variance with actual audited balance sheet and P&L account for the said period, notes that the difference between the two was due to the over-valuation of the fixed assets for availing of the bank loan; Assessee had argued that it is usual practice to draw up accounts on the basis of estimates for the presentation to a bank at a time prior to when the assessee is statutorily required to complete the annual accounts and that addition cannot be made based on such estimated figures in Form 3CB; Rejecting assessee’s stand, HC quashes the practice of window-dressing of accounts for making it attractive for bankers and subsequently removing the gloss and sheen at the time of paying taxes; HC observes that certificate issued by the CA firm in Form 3CB purported to give an impression that it was in exercise of an audit as required u/s 44AB (for which Form 3CD is prescribed), however it was presented in a statutory form with the fine print of paragraph 2(A) thereunder indicating that it was only an estimate; HC remarks that “It is scarcely expected of a banker to question the veracity of any accounts certified by a firm of chartered accountants or to look into the fine print and comprehend therefrom that utterly bogus figures had been furnished only for the purpose of availing of the credit facilities from the bank.”; HC rules that “the balance-sheet and profit and loss accounts of an assessee accompanied by a certificate as to its fairness, notwithstanding the caveat as noticed in paragraph 2(A) thereof, cannot be tailor-made to suit a particular purpose…”; Applies the doctrine of pari delicto to preclude the assessee from detracting from the figures contained in the balance-sheet and profit and loss accounts certified on July 18, 2005 at any subsequent stage; Directs Registrar to forward the copy of this order to ICAI for appropriate steps to be taken against the CA firm.:HC 

No comments:

Can GST Under RCM Not Charged and Paid from FY 2017-18 to October 2024 be Settled in FY 2024-25?

 In a recent and significant update to GST regulations, registered persons in India can now clear unpaid Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liab...