HC
dismisses assessee’s writ, upholds recovery of interest on belated payment
of installments under sales tax deferment scheme u/s 25 of AP VAT
Act, 2005 (Act) dealing with recovery of tax as an arrear of land
revenue; Remarks that, “after indicating four different types of amounts, viz.,
(1) tax assessed; (2) penalty levied; (3) interest payable under the Act; and
(4) amount of tax under the deferment scheme, the last part of Section 25 uses
an omnibus expression, viz., the whole of the amount then remaining unpaid”,
thus, rejects assessee’s plea that Section 25 cannot be invoked for recovery of
interest due on installments; Explains that, tax deferment is granted by
Government generally in terms of Section 69 of Act but manner in which
eligibility period has to be fixed, method of debiting eligibility
amount and question of repayment, are all left to rule making authorities u/s
69(3); Perusing Rule 24(5)(b) of AP VAT Rules, HC elucidates that, “Once the
order granting the facility of deferred payment of tax becomes infructuous, the
amount that remains unpaid automatically gets restored to the status of a tax”,
consequently, Section 22(2) would come into play which indicates that liability
to pay interest is not just correlated to tax assessed or penalty levied, but
has a correlation even to 'any other amount due' which would
include “arrears or installments payable under a deferment scheme”;
Further finds no illegality in the order of attachment, states that, “To have an
attachment on the property which is already under mortgage to the Bank is
completely different from the priority that Section 26E of the Securitization
Act talks about” : Andhra Pradesh HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment