Monday, 26 March 2012

In remand, s. 14A disallowance cannot exceed original disallowance

CIT vs. Machino Plastic Ltd (Delhi High Court)


The AO made a disallowance u/s 14A of Rs. 45 Lakhs on the ground that the assessee had not been able to segregate expenses relating to earning of dividend income and that borrowed funds had been used to fund the investments. The CIT (A) reduced the quantum of disallowance & the department accepted that. In the assessee’s appeal, the Tribunal totally deleted the disallowance. On appeal by the department, HELD:

No comments:

Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis

The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...