Saturday, 10 March 2012

S. 54F does not require construction to be complete within specified period

CIT vs. Sambandam Udaykumar (Karnataka High Court)


The assessee sold shares for Rs. 4.18 crores and, within 12 months, invested Rs. 2.16 crores thereof to construct a house property and claimed exemption u/s 54F. However, as even after the expiry of 3 years of the date of transfer, the construction of the house was not complete and sale deed not executed, the AO & CIT (A) denied relief u/s 54F though the Tribunal granted it. On appeal by the department to the High Court, HELD dismissing the appeal:

No comments:

Navigating Section 79: How Continuity of Beneficial Ownership Preserves Loss Carry-Forward

  A recent ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in   ACIT vs. Lurgi India International Services Pvt. Ltd.   provides crucial ...