Wednesday, 9 May 2012

A composite contract for installation & commissioning cannot be split so as to exempt the profits from offshore supply of goods

In Re Roxar Maximum Reservoir Performance WLL (AAR)


 
The Applicant entered into a contract with ONGC for “services for supply, installation and commissioning of 36 manometer gauges”. The applicant claimed that the contract, though composite, had to be split into various components in line with Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries 288 ITR 408 (SC), Hyundai Heavy Industries 291 ITR 482 (SC) & Hyosung Corporation 314 ITR 343 (AAR), and that the income attributable to the supply of manometer gauges was not taxable in India because the title to the goods had passed outside India & the payment was received outside India. HELD by the AAR rejecting the plea:

No comments:

Supreme Court ruling holds non-compete fee is allowable as revenue expenditure

  The Hon’ble Supreme Court settled the long-standing controversy surrounding the tax treatment of non-compete fees and, based on the facts ...