Friday, 18 May 2012

S. 14A: Onus is on AO to show expenditure is incurred to earn tax-free income

ACIT vs. SIL Investment Ltd (ITAT Delhi)


 
For AY 2006-07, the assessee earned dividend of Rs. 17 lakhs and LTCG of Rs. 12 crores. The assessee claimed that it had incurred no expense to earn the tax-free income and so no s. 14A disallowance was permissible. However, the AO disallowed Rs. 2 crores under Rule 8D towards interest and admin expenditure. The CIT (A) accepted that no interest was incurred and deleted that disallowance. He also reduced the admin expenditure disallowance. On appeal to the Tribunal, HELD:

No comments:

Supreme Court ruling holds non-compete fee is allowable as revenue expenditure

  The Hon’ble Supreme Court settled the long-standing controversy surrounding the tax treatment of non-compete fees and, based on the facts ...