Thursday, 27 February 2014

S. 254(2A): The Tribunal has no power to extend stay of demand beyond 365 days even if the assessee is not at fault. If dept seeks an adjournment, ITAT may either refuse it or dept should undertake not to recover the demand

CIT vs. Maruti Suzuki (India) Limited (Delhi High Court)

(i) In view of the third proviso to s. 254(2A) of the Act substituted by Finance Act, 2008 with effect from 1st October, 2008, the Tribunal cannot extend stay beyond the period of 365 days from the date of first order of stay

No comments:

Share sale by Passive Shareholder taxable as Long-Term Capital Gains and not Business Income irrespective of non-compete clause in the SPA

  As per Income Tax Laws, any sum received or receivable in cash or kind under an agreement for not carrying business or profession is treat...