Friday, 21 February 2014

S. 254: Tribunal is not required to consider pleadings, material etc to which its pointed attention is not drawn

Dholadhar Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

It is true, as held by the Supreme Court in a long line of cases that the Tribunal is duty-bound to consider all the grounds, the evidence produced and consider the contentions of the parties before it and all other material brought to its notice in a judicial spirit and should not feel incommoded by technicalities: The duty is limited to the points raised before it. It would be placing an impossible burden on the Tribunal if it is ordained to rule upon aspects and contentions which were not raised by the parties before it or to deal with pleadings, evidence or material to which its pointed attention was not drawn in the course of the proceedings and which lies buried in the forest of papers filed by the parties

No comments:

Karnataka HC holds HSNS Cess framework unconstitutional due to manner of Cess calculation

  This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...