Thursday, 24 July 2014

G.K. Consultants Limited vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
S. 147: Retracted statement cannot form the basis of reopening. Protective assessment without substantive assessment is not permissible
(ii) The AO has not made any specific allegations against the assessee. He intended to make a protective assessment on the assessee. However, while there can be a substantive assessment without any protective assessment, there cannot be a protective assessment/addition without a substantive assessment/addition. As no substantive assessment/addition was made in the hands of Subodh Gupta, the protective reassessment assessment on the assessee is not permissible (M.P. Ramachandaran 32 SOT 592 (Mum) & Suresh K Jajoo 39 SOT 514 (Mum) followed)

No comments:

India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications

  The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...