Tuesday, 23 December 2014

S. 254(2): If the Tribunal accepts that a mistake has crept in the order, interests of justice is served if the entire order is recalled (suo moto by the ITAT) & appeal re-heard. Appeals should not be disposed off in “light hearted” and “casual manner”

State Bank of India vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)



During the pendency of the Appeal before the High Court, the Tribunal passed an order on the Miscellaneous Application and revived the appeal filed before it for hearing afresh on merits in relation to withdrawal of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia). However, as the assessee had not asked for recall of the ground challenging the exercise of […]

No comments:

Safe Harbour vs. Advance Pricing Agreements: Choosing the Right Path to Transfer Pricing Certainty

  While Safe Harbour focuses on standardization, an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) provides a customized solution. An APA is a binding agr...