| Old Rules of APB Opinion No. 17 (Before superseded by SFAS No. 142) |
a. Intangible Assets b. Issued in August 1970 c. APB Opinion No. 17: Superseded by SFAS No. 142, June 2001 a. Cost of acquisition --> recorded on the balance sheet as intangible assets b. Amortized over the periods of benefits --> not to exceed 40 years a. Cost of developing such intangible assets --> charged to income when incurred. b. Internally developed intangible assets --> not recognized as an asset on the balance sheet. a. Intangible assets --> amortized over the periods of benefits. b. The period of amortization --> should not exceed forty years. c. It is assumed that --> the value of intangible assets will eventually disappear. |
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
SIN 142 under US GAAP.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 54F Survives Family Connection: ITAT Backs Genuine Intra-Family Property Transaction
In a recent ruling, the Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal examined the availability of deduction under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
This is to update you on procedure prescribed by the Office of the Development Commissioner, Karnataka Sub Zone (the “Office”) to be foll...
No comments:
Post a Comment