. [S.43A, 80IA, 115JB, 143(3)]
The
assessee was a company engaged in generation of power.After verifying the books
of account and
information
submitted by the assessee, the AO completed the assessment under section 143(3)
after
allowing
deduction under section 80-IA while accepting the book profit under section
115JB.
AO
in course of scrutiny proceeding conducted detailed enquiry assessee also
submitted its
explanation
explaining why it should not be treated as income. Since in view of decision of
Supreme
Court
view taken by AO was possible view, only because view taken by AO did not
appear to be
correct
to Commissioner, it could not be said that such view was erroneous and
prejudicial to interests
of
revenue
Assessee
treated gain derived from sale of Carbon Emission Reduction Certificates
(CERCs) as
revenue
receipt and claimed deduction under section 80-IA which was allowed by AO.
Commissioner,
in order passed under section 263, held that gain from sale of CERCs having no
direct
nexus
with eligible business of assessee, it could not be part of business profit so
as to allow
deduction
under section 80-IA. Whether amount received on sale of CERCs was capital in
nature
and,
therefore, even if AO had allowed deduction on that amount under section 80-IA
treating it as
revenue
income, no prejudice was caused to revenue which is one of conditions for
invoking
jurisdiction
under section 263.
Where
reimbursement of advance tax by parties was not treated as income in assessee's
books of
account,
same also cannot be considered under provisions of section 115JB, which is to
be computed
based
on profit and loss account of assessee-company.
Non-mentioning
of all issues on which enquiry was made by AO in body of assessment order does
not
indicate
lack of enquiry or non-application of mind; non-mentioning of such facts in
assessment order
would
not make it erroneous and prejudicial to interests of revenue. (AY.
2008-09)(ITA No. 897
(Hyd)
of 2013 dt 26-06-2014)
Lanco
Kondapalli Power Ltd. .v. JCIT(2014) 33 ITR 142/50 taxmann.com 442 / (2015) 152
ITD
132
(Hyd.)(Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment