This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC), in the case of Taparia Tools Ltd. (Taxpayer), wherein the issue was whether a taxpayer can be permitted full deduction under the provisions of the Indian Tax Laws (ITL) for upfront payment of debenture interest, though such payment has been amortised over the tenure of the debenture in the books of account. The SC, based on the facts, held that since the Taxpayer had claimed deduction for the full amount of upfront interest payment, the same should be allowed in the year of payment and should not be spread over the term of the debentures. The SC reiterated that there is no concept of deferred revenue expenditure under the ITL. Furthermore, the SC also ruled that the treatment given in the books of account is not an estoppel against the statute to claim deduction.
Thursday, 26 March 2015
Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC), in the case of Taparia Tools Ltd. (Taxpayer), wherein the issue was whether a taxpayer can be permitted full deduction under the provisions of the Indian Tax Laws (ITL) for upfront payment of debenture interest, though such payment has been amortised over the tenure of the debenture in the books of account. The SC, based on the facts, held that since the Taxpayer had claimed deduction for the full amount of upfront interest payment, the same should be allowed in the year of payment and should not be spread over the term of the debentures. The SC reiterated that there is no concept of deferred revenue expenditure under the ITL. Furthermore, the SC also ruled that the treatment given in the books of account is not an estoppel against the statute to claim deduction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Summary of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) Mandate
The document provides an FAQ-style overview of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism, which will become mandatory under GST regulat...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
No comments:
Post a Comment