|
Australian multinational anti-avoidance law, country by country reporting and increased penalties |
|
|
||
|
||
On 16 September 2015 the Australian Treasurer introduced a Bill to implement the following rules for multinational groups with global income of over AUD$1 billion, which are covered in this EY Tax Alert:
·
Multinational
anti-avoidance law (MAAL) to apply to foreign multinationals generating
certain profits earned in Australia without Australian permanent
establishments. The MAAL is to apply on or after 1 January 2016, to target
multinationals that implement arrangements to avoid having a taxable presence
in Australia.
·
Country by country
(CbC) reporting to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), implementing
additional CbC requirements arising from the global OECD BEPS initiative,
with local file, master file and CBC reporting, for income years commencing
on or after 1 January 2016; and
·
Doubling of
penalties for certain large company transactions for tax avoidance schemes
including certain transfer pricing benefits obtained on or after 1 July 2015.
The MAAL’s wide-ranging impact requires risk assessment for foreign businesses. As the Treasurer’s Second Reading Speech states, the Bill “further strengthens the draft legislation that was announced in the 2015 Budget … by removing the condition for multinationals to operate in a ‘no or low’ tax jurisdiction … All significant global entities with revenues over $1 billion who book their revenue offshore will need to consider these rules and may need to review their structures. With over 1,000 multinational entities operating in Australia with revenues greater than $1 billion, this means these rules will have far reaching effect...” The doubling of tax avoidance scheme penalties for significant global entities increases the importance for companies to have documented reasonably arguable positions. Large multinational groups need to evaluate the implications of the new transfer pricing documentation and reporting requirements and implement the required changes to documentation, policies, and systems in advance of the 1 January 2016 start date. A CbC readiness review and pilot can assist in identifying and heading off risks, and evaluate and address any gaps in information or potential for misinterpretation in advance. |
Wednesday, 16 September 2015
Country by Country reporting introduced in Australia.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Identifying a Drafting Error in GST Amnesty Provisions
Provision Regarding Amnesty Scheme Section 128A was introduced into the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act by the Finance Act, 2024,...
-
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA an...
-
1. Situation I. Tax Department Summons An employee received a summons from the tax department demanding an explanation for failing to discl...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Many of us rely on home loans to purchase residential property, but are you fully aware of how tax laws impact your financial strategy? Unde...
-
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
Particulars Singapore Hong Kong Corporate Tax rate 17% 16.5%. Numb...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
No comments:
Post a Comment