In a recent decision, the Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that capital gains arising on transfer of capital assets from holding companies to their wholly owned subsidiaries, which was not liable to tax under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) read with section 47(iv) of the Act, should be excluded from computation of book profits for levying Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Act
Tuesday, 8 September 2015
Minimum Alternate Tax under section 115JB not payable on receipts that do not form part of the Total Income
In a recent decision, the Mumbai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) held that capital gains arising on transfer of capital assets from holding companies to their wholly owned subsidiaries, which was not liable to tax under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) read with section 47(iv) of the Act, should be excluded from computation of book profits for levying Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Act
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment