Cochin ITAT dismisses
Revenue’s appeal against CIT(A) order allowing deduction u/s 80P to assessee
(primary agricultural co-operative society), distinguishes SC ruling in
Citizens Co-operative Society; Notes that SC had denied deduction u/s 80P to
assessee therein as its activities were in violation of the Provisions of
the Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995 (MACSA) under which it was
formed and substantial deposits were from `nominal members’ who were
actually non-members as per the relevant provisions; Observes that definition
of a 'member' as provided in Sec 2(1) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act
includes ‘nominal member’, holds that “deposits from such nominal members
cannot be considered or treated as from the non-members or from public as was
noted by the aforementioned SC ruling’; Also Refers to SC ruling in U.P.
Co-operative Cane Union which had held that the term ‘member’ u/s 80P(2) has to
be construed in terms definition under State cooperative law; Relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Limited &
Ors., wherein it was held that a primary agricultural credit Society registered
as such under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 is entitled to the
benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2); Holds that AO is not competent to decide issue
whether assessee is a primary co-operative society or a co-operative bank,
notes that RBI has issued letter to societies similar to assessee stating
that they are primary agricultural credit societies and thus, rejects AO’s
contention that assessee is not entitled to deduction in view of provisions of
Sec. 80P(4) (denying benefit to co-operative bank):ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment