Cochin ITAT dismisses
Revenue’s appeal against CIT(A) order allowing deduction u/s 80P to assessee
(primary agricultural co-operative society), distinguishes SC ruling in
Citizens Co-operative Society; Notes that SC had denied deduction u/s 80P to
assessee therein as its activities were in violation of the Provisions of
the Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995 (MACSA) under which it was
formed and substantial deposits were from `nominal members’ who were
actually non-members as per the relevant provisions; Observes that definition
of a 'member' as provided in Sec 2(1) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act
includes ‘nominal member’, holds that “deposits from such nominal members
cannot be considered or treated as from the non-members or from public as was
noted by the aforementioned SC ruling’; Also Refers to SC ruling in U.P.
Co-operative Cane Union which had held that the term ‘member’ u/s 80P(2) has to
be construed in terms definition under State cooperative law; Relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Limited &
Ors., wherein it was held that a primary agricultural credit Society registered
as such under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 is entitled to the
benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2); Holds that AO is not competent to decide issue
whether assessee is a primary co-operative society or a co-operative bank,
notes that RBI has issued letter to societies similar to assessee stating
that they are primary agricultural credit societies and thus, rejects AO’s
contention that assessee is not entitled to deduction in view of provisions of
Sec. 80P(4) (denying benefit to co-operative bank):ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment