Mumbai ITAT rules that
sales tax subsidy received by Grasim Industries (‘assessee’) under UP subsidy
scheme of Government for setting up industry in the notified area during AYs
1995-96 to 1998-99, is a non-taxable capital receipt; Notes that for promoting
development of certain areas of the State, the U.P. Government granted
exemption from payment of sales tax to new units as well as existing units
which have undertaken expansion, diversification or modernization by making
investment in fixed capital exceeding Rs. 50 crore; Since the
quantification of incentive was linked to production of goods, turnover of sale
of goods and the maximum exemption was limited to certain percentage of fixed
capital investment, Revenue had treated the subsidy as production incentive and
taxed it as revenue receipt; Rejecting Revenue’s treatment, ITAT notes that the
purpose of subsidy scheme is to attract people to invest and take part in
industrialization of certain areas in the State and not for enhancing the
production; Rules that it is the object for which the subsidy / assistance is
given determines the nature of incentive / subsidy, clarifies that “The form or
the mechanism through which a subsidy is given is irrelevant.”, applies
‘purpose test’ laid down by SC in Ponni Sugars case, :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment