Mumbai ITAT rules that
sales tax subsidy received by Grasim Industries (‘assessee’) under UP subsidy
scheme of Government for setting up industry in the notified area during AYs
1995-96 to 1998-99, is a non-taxable capital receipt; Notes that for promoting
development of certain areas of the State, the U.P. Government granted
exemption from payment of sales tax to new units as well as existing units
which have undertaken expansion, diversification or modernization by making
investment in fixed capital exceeding Rs. 50 crore; Since the
quantification of incentive was linked to production of goods, turnover of sale
of goods and the maximum exemption was limited to certain percentage of fixed
capital investment, Revenue had treated the subsidy as production incentive and
taxed it as revenue receipt; Rejecting Revenue’s treatment, ITAT notes that the
purpose of subsidy scheme is to attract people to invest and take part in
industrialization of certain areas in the State and not for enhancing the
production; Rules that it is the object for which the subsidy / assistance is
given determines the nature of incentive / subsidy, clarifies that “The form or
the mechanism through which a subsidy is given is irrelevant.”, applies
‘purpose test’ laid down by SC in Ponni Sugars case, :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment