Bangalore ITAT rejects
assessee-individual’s claim of ‘exempt’ long term capital gains (‘LTCG’) of Rs.
42 lakh arising on sale of ‘penny stocks’ during AY 2015-16, upholds AO’s stand
that the LTCG booked by assessee were bogus and the gains were assessable as
‘business income’; Rejects assessee’s stand that the genuineness of LTCG claim
cannot be doubted since the contract notes were placed on record and the
payment were made through cheques identifying the company whose shares were
transacted; Upon examining the financials of the company, ITAT observes that
the financial worth of the company was very meager and not worth to be invested
in, remarks that “With such financials, we are unable to understand how there
can be manifold increase in the shares.”; Further observes that taking
cognizance of BSE websites, money control website, investigation wing, SEBI
reports, AO had noted that the price of these shares saw phenomenal rise and
were constantly traded near the circuit limit (of 5%) so as to avail maximum
price rise without hitting and triggering the circuit limit, and thereby avoid
surveillance by the Stock Exchange Regulator; ITAT concludes that Revenue has
brought sufficient material on record to demonstrate that unaccounted money was
introduced in the books through LTCG by circuitous means.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment