Delhi ITAT holds
assessee-society (formed for organizing South Asian Federation Winter Games,
2009) liable to deduct TDS u/s. 194C on amount tendered as ‘advance’ to various
PSUs (Public Sector Undertakings) w.r.t. various works relating to construction
of the infrastructure for winter games for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11; Rejects
assessee’s stand that it was merely a pass through entity that has been granted
sum for organizing the winter games and it did not enter into any contract with
the parties to whom payments were made; ITAT acknowledges that grants / sponsorship
received by the assessee, are in turn, disbursed to various recipients (i.e.
PSUs) who got the work done through contractors and deducted TDS on payments
made to such contractors; However, ITAT remarks that “Though the contractor may
be identified and engaged by the other organization, however, the
implementation and utilization is the sole responsibility of the assessee.
Otherwise, there is no other reason for the formation of the assessee society”;
Observes that as required u/s. 194C, assessee is the person responsible for
payments of sums to the PSUs, which infact was paid by the assessee; Clarifies
that “Merely because the assessee is provided grant for onward distribution to
these parties does not exclude the assessee from the liability for deduction of
tax at source u/s 194C”; W.r.t. assessee’s alternative argument that all the
recipients have already received the grant and if tax is recovered from the
assessee it ought to be refundable in the hands of the recipients, ITAT directs
the AO to verify as to whether due taxes have been paid by the recipients in
terms of the proviso to Sec. 201(1); Lastly, ITAT deletes penalty levied u/s.
271C absent contemptuous conduct on assessee’s part for non-deduction of TDS;
Separately in context of payments made to non-resident parties for equipment
supply, ITAT rules that Sec. 195 TDS shall not apply as no income has accrued
to those parties in India, in terms of Sections 5 & 9 of the Act and title
of the goods has passed outside India.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment