Delhi ITAT holds
assessee-society (formed for organizing South Asian Federation Winter Games,
2009) liable to deduct TDS u/s. 194C on amount tendered as ‘advance’ to various
PSUs (Public Sector Undertakings) w.r.t. various works relating to construction
of the infrastructure for winter games for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11; Rejects
assessee’s stand that it was merely a pass through entity that has been granted
sum for organizing the winter games and it did not enter into any contract with
the parties to whom payments were made; ITAT acknowledges that grants / sponsorship
received by the assessee, are in turn, disbursed to various recipients (i.e.
PSUs) who got the work done through contractors and deducted TDS on payments
made to such contractors; However, ITAT remarks that “Though the contractor may
be identified and engaged by the other organization, however, the
implementation and utilization is the sole responsibility of the assessee.
Otherwise, there is no other reason for the formation of the assessee society”;
Observes that as required u/s. 194C, assessee is the person responsible for
payments of sums to the PSUs, which infact was paid by the assessee; Clarifies
that “Merely because the assessee is provided grant for onward distribution to
these parties does not exclude the assessee from the liability for deduction of
tax at source u/s 194C”; W.r.t. assessee’s alternative argument that all the
recipients have already received the grant and if tax is recovered from the
assessee it ought to be refundable in the hands of the recipients, ITAT directs
the AO to verify as to whether due taxes have been paid by the recipients in
terms of the proviso to Sec. 201(1); Lastly, ITAT deletes penalty levied u/s.
271C absent contemptuous conduct on assessee’s part for non-deduction of TDS;
Separately in context of payments made to non-resident parties for equipment
supply, ITAT rules that Sec. 195 TDS shall not apply as no income has accrued
to those parties in India, in terms of Sections 5 & 9 of the Act and title
of the goods has passed outside India.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat High Court reaffirms mandatory right to personal hearing in Faceless Assessments
Recently, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in B.M. Developers v. Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department ruled in favor of the taxpayer and...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
No comments:
Post a Comment