This Tax
Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC)[1]. The
issue before the court was that in absence of any challenge to the order of
assessment under Customs and Central Excise, whether refund application against
the assessed duty can be entertained.
Sunday, 29 September 2019
Tax return and audit reports filing due date for tax year 2018-19 applicable to taxpayers liable for audit is extended to 31 October 2019
As per
the Indian tax laws (ITL) [1], in case of taxpayers [2]
being:
(a) company or
(b) other taxpayers whose accounts are required to be audited under the ITL or any other law for the time being in force or
(c) working partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited under the ITL or any other law for the time being in force,
the due
date for submission of their tax returns for tax year 2018-19 is 30 September
2019. Further, if a taxpayer furnishes tax return after the due date, but
before 31 December of the following tax year, the taxpayer is liable for
payment of late fee[3] of INR 5,000. On further delay, the fee
increases to INR 10,000.
The
Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) [4] vide order dated 27
September 2019[5] (Order) has extended the due date for filing tax
return and various reports of audit in relation to tax year 2018-19 for
aforesaid category of taxpayers who are liable to file their tax returns by 30
September 2019 to 31 October 2019. The extension is granted primarily due to
difficulties being faced by taxpayers in furnishing the tax returns for various
reasons including availability of limited time with tax professionals for
completion of audits, floods in certain parts of the country, etc.
Further,
since the time prescribed under the ITL for furnishing tax return itself is
extended, fee for late filling of tax return may also not be leviable for the
tax returns filed up to 31 October 2019.
Thursday, 26 September 2019
IS E Assessment is a Game Changes?
A. Introduction:
Through Finance Act, 2018, Central Government has intended to
introduce new scheme of scrutiny assessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for
improving effectiveness of tax administration. It has thus brought three new
sections to the Income Tax Act viz. 143(3A) to prescribe new procedure by the
Central Government, 143(3B) to enable Central Government to notify applications
of provisions of the Income Tax Act with such modification, adaptions or
exceptions as may be specified and 143(3C) to provide for laying every
notification issued u/s 143(3A) or 143(3B) before each House of Parliament.
Interest earned on unutillised funds kept in FDRs due to delay in completion of project held as capital receipt
Where assessee-company, incorporated for development and operation of multipurpose port terminal, raised certain share capital in form of foreign inward remittance, in view of fact that said project got delayed due to various reasons beyond assessee's control and, thus, assessee had to keep unutilised funds in banks in form of FDRs, interest income earned on said deposits being in nature of capital receipt, was not liable to tax
[2019] 109 taxmann.com 105 (Mumbai - Trib.)/[2019] 71 ITR(T) 390 (Mumbai - Trib.)
Wednesday, 11 September 2019
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019: key takeaways
The
Companies (Amendment) Bill received the President’s assent on 31 July 2019 and
was published in the official gazette on the same date as the Companies
(Amendment) Act, 2019 (Amendment Act).
The Amendment Act further amends the Companies Act, 2013 (Act). Majority
of the provisions of the Amendment Act are deemed to have come into effect on 2
November 2018. The remaining provisions,
barring the amendment relating to corporate social responsibility, were made
effective from 15 August 2019.
The key takeaways of the Amendment Act are:
·
Dematerialized securities
·
Penalty for certain offences
·
Enhanced penalty for repeated defaults
·
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
·
Commencement of business
·
Registration of charges
·
Beneficial ownership
·
Power of central government and National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in case of oppression and mismanagement
The Amendment Act seeks to
strengthen the existing governance norms and compliance management in the
corporate sector by making a provision for imposition of enhanced penalties in
case of repeated defaults. The central government now has a greater say in
cases of oppression and mismanagement, and the individuals responsible for the
same can now be directly held accountable.
The Amendment Act has made it mandatory for all companies
(required under the Act) to set aside monetary contributions for corporate
social responsibility, even if such contribution is not earmarked for a
specific purpose.
HC rules provision prescribing due date to claim transitional credit under GST is not mandatory
This Tax Alert summarizes a
recent ruling [1]
of Gujarat High Court (HC). The issues in the Writ Petition was to allow filing
of declaration for transitional credit beyond the due date and whether rule 117
of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 providing the due date to claim
transitional credit is procedural in nature, and thus merely directory and not
a mandatory provision.
Monday, 2 September 2019
PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON ELECTRONIC INVOICE STANDARDS TO BE USED UNDER GST SYSTEM
1.
Background
The GST Council has decided to introduce
electronic-invoice (hereinafter called as e-invoice) on voluntary basis
from January 2020.
The new system will lead to one-time
reporting on B2B invoice
data in the form it is generated to
reduce reporting in multiple formats (one for GSTR-1 and the other for e-way
bill) and to generate Sales and Purchase Registers (ANX-1 and ANX-2) and from
this data to keep the Return (RET-1 etc.) ready for filing. The other aim is to
make reporting of invoices as an integral part of the business process to
eliminate the process of compilation of invoices at the end of the month.
Lastly, it will lead to substantial reduction in
input credit verification issues as same data will get reported to tax
department as well as to the buyer in his inward supply (purchase) register on
receipt of info thru GST System – as buyer can reconcile with his Purchase
Order and accept/reject well in time.
CBIC issues further clarifications on Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent circular [1]
issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on Sabka Vishwas
(Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
Apart from reiterating the importance and benefits,
the circular clarifies on few more issues arising out of the provisions of the
scheme. Circular also provides instructions to the officers to make the scheme
a success and ensure its smooth implementation.
The key clarifications are as follows:
• If a person has been issued a show cause
notice (SCN) for erroneous refund, they will still be eligible to file
declaration for other disputed cases under the scheme.
• The dispute relating to only penalty or late
fee pending before appellate forum shall also be eligible under the scheme.
• Ineligibility under the scheme for finally
heard matters in appeal shall not apply in cases where the hearings are
rescheduled after the final hearing due to new bench, change in officer or any
other reason.
• Cases where proceedings before the Settlement
Commission are abated, shall be covered under the scheme, provided the
eligibility is otherwise established. Further, any pending appeals, reference
or writ petition filed against or any arrears emerging out of the orders of the
Commission are also eligible under the scheme.
Clarification issued by the government on eligibility
of cases of penalty/ late fee pending before the appellate authority is likely
to benefit the taxpayers, considering the quantum of such litigation.
More such clarification may be expected from the CBIC
basis practical and technical difficulties faced by the taxpayers in the
process of filing the declarations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Recommendations of 55th GST council meeting | 21 December 2024
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...