This Tax Alert summarizes a
recent ruling [1]
of Gujarat High Court (HC). The issues in the Writ Petition was to allow filing
of declaration for transitional credit beyond the due date and whether rule 117
of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 providing the due date to claim
transitional credit is procedural in nature, and thus merely directory and not
a mandatory provision.
According
to the petitioner, the intention of the Government was not to collect tax twice
on the same goods and thus, credit of duty/tax paid earlier is admissible as
transitional credit, even if declaration in Form GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 are not
filed within the due date on account of technical difficulties. The phrase
“technical difficulties on the common portal” should be interpreted liberally.
Referring
to various rulings, HC observed that:
·
Section 140(3) of
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 provides for a substantive right which
cannot be curtailed or defeated on account of the procedural lapse.
·
The entitlement of
credit of the eligible duties is a vested right.
·
Liability to pay GST on
stock carried forward from previous regime without corresponding credit would
lead to double taxation.
·
Rule 117 is violative of
Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.
Thus, HC
directed the respondents to allow petitioner to file declaration in Form GST
TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 to enable them to claim transitional credit of eligible
duties. HC held that rule 117 providing the due date for the purposes of
claiming transitional credit is procedural in nature and thus, the same should
not be construed as a mandatory provision.
Comments
Basis the
principles reinforced by the HC, decision seems to provide a directive to tax
officials to liberally consider cases of delayed declarations for allowing the
transitional credits notwithstanding the time lines prescribed for claiming
such credits.
Ruling
may help taxpayers who have yet to file declaration in TRAN-1 and 2 to claim
transitional credit.
No comments:
Post a Comment