Issue: Sec 14
A read with Rule 8D: Retrospective vs Prospective application of Rule
The ground of appeal related to disallowance made u/s. 14A read
with rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. During the assessment year under
consideration, the appellant assessee had shown a dividend income of Rs.
74,25,000/- claimed as exempt income u/s. 10(34) of the Act. The suo motu
disallowance computed by the appellant assessee in the return of income at Rs.
4,69,487/- u/s. 14. During the assessment proceedings the assessee was directed
to file the details of tax free income earned by the assessee and to explain
why provisions of section 14A of the Act should not be invoked. In response to
that the assessee submitted its reply on 14-12-2016 along with calculation for
such suo motu disallowance u/s. 14A as it also reflected from the order passed
by the Ld. AO. However, such explanation as rendered by the assessee was not
found acceptable and considering the CBDT Circular dated 11-02-2014 and the
recent Amendment in Rule 8D vide Notification dated 02-06-2016, the
disallowance of expenditure u/s. 14A of the Act the Ld. AO computed the
disallowance of Rs. 2,67,07,781/- at 1% of the average monthly balance of the
investment. Since the assessee had suo motu disallowed expenditure of Rs. 4,69,487/-,
the balance amount of Rs. 2,62,38,194/- was disallowed/added back to the total
income of the assessee by the AO.
No comments:
Post a Comment