In a relief to Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions, the Bangalore ITAT ruled that Payments made for online advertising and marketing to non-resident payees such as Facebook, Amazon Web Services (AWS) for advertising, marketing does not tantamount to payment of ‘Royalty’ under the relevant tax treaties.
ITAT relying on the SC’s dictum in ‘Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited’ held that beneficial DTAA provisions are to be considered for determining the taxability of income. On perusal of agreements with the non-resident payees, ITAT observed that mere usage of facility provided by Facebook or Rocket Science does not render the payment as ‘Royalty’, as copyright attached to the facility is not parted with. In the case of AWS, the payment is made only for using information technology infrastructure facilities on a rental basis. Hence the question of transferring the copyright over those facilities does not arise at all. Thereby, concluding that payments made to non-residents do not give rise to any income chargeable in India, and thus there was no requirement to deduct tax at source u/s 195. The judgement brings with it good tidings for the non-resident recipient companies, as erstwhile it was becoming challenging for the companies to claim credit in their home country, if tax was perceived as wrongly withheld in the source country (in this case India). The ruling would also go a long way in reinstating the foreign investors’ confidence in the taxation & legislative prowess of the country.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
1 comment:
Allowability can be challenged for non deduction. Option is to apply equalization levy.
Post a Comment