In a major relief to JMW India, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench has held that the interest subsidy and the excise duty refund shall be treated as capital receipts and therefore, not subject to income tax while computing book profit under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Theassessee, a company engaged in the business of trading and manufacturing of copper products, filed its income tax return declaring total income at Rs.1,23,71,780/-. The Assessing Officer, while completing the proceedings, observed thatthe assessee, had received an amount of Rs.30,01,143/- representing interest subsidy and an amount of Rs.4,98,49,144/- representing Excise Duty refund which are subject to income tax. Before ethe Tribunal, the assessee contended that the interest subsidy of Rs.30,01,143/- and Excise Duty refund of Rs.4,98,49,144/- shall be excluded for the purpose of computing book profit u/s 115JB. While allowing the plea of the assessee, Judicial Member Vijay Pal Rao and Accountant Member R K Panda held that “since, in the instant case, the Revenue has accepted the order of the CIT(A) in holding that interest subsidy and Excise Duty refund are capital receipts, therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Ankit Metal & Power Ltd., cited (supra) and in absence of any contrary material brought to our notice, we hold that the above two receipts being not in the nature of income cannot be included for the purpose of computation u/s 115JB of the IT Act. We, therefore, set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) on this issue and allow the grounds raised by the assessee.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment