In a major relief to JMW India, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench has held that the interest subsidy and the excise duty refund shall be treated as capital receipts and therefore, not subject to income tax while computing book profit under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Theassessee, a company engaged in the business of trading and manufacturing of copper products, filed its income tax return declaring total income at Rs.1,23,71,780/-. The Assessing Officer, while completing the proceedings, observed thatthe assessee, had received an amount of Rs.30,01,143/- representing interest subsidy and an amount of Rs.4,98,49,144/- representing Excise Duty refund which are subject to income tax. Before ethe Tribunal, the assessee contended that the interest subsidy of Rs.30,01,143/- and Excise Duty refund of Rs.4,98,49,144/- shall be excluded for the purpose of computing book profit u/s 115JB. While allowing the plea of the assessee, Judicial Member Vijay Pal Rao and Accountant Member R K Panda held that “since, in the instant case, the Revenue has accepted the order of the CIT(A) in holding that interest subsidy and Excise Duty refund are capital receipts, therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Ankit Metal & Power Ltd., cited (supra) and in absence of any contrary material brought to our notice, we hold that the above two receipts being not in the nature of income cannot be included for the purpose of computation u/s 115JB of the IT Act. We, therefore, set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) on this issue and allow the grounds raised by the assessee.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Karnataka HC holds HSNS Cess framework unconstitutional due to manner of Cess calculation
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
The Supreme Court of India has issued several key judgments in recent years concerning the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). These...
No comments:
Post a Comment