This Tax Alert summarizes recent Notifications and Circulars issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) pursuant to recommendations made in the 53rd Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council meeting. The key highlights are:
► Rule
28(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (CGST Rules) has been
amended retrospectively from 26 October 2023 to provide value of supply of
providing corporate guarantee at 1% of the amount guaranteed per annum or
actual consideration, whichever is higher. This valuation does not apply to
export of such services or where the recipient is entitled to full input tax
credit.
Value
of such supply will be calculated basis the amount guaranteed and not on the
basis of loan actually disbursed.
► Rule
59 of CGST Rules has been amended to provide for an optional facility by way of
GSTR-1A to amend or add details in GSTR-1 before filing GSTR-3B for the same
tax period.
► Proviso
has been inserted in Rule 88B(1) to provide that interest is not leviable on
amount available in cash ledger (on the due date of filing GSTR-3B) which is
utilised while filing return belatedly.
► Refund
of additional IGST paid on account of upward price revision subsequent to
exports needs to be claimed by filing application in GST RFD-01 before expiry
of two years from the relevant date.
► The
rate of TCS (tax collected at source) is reduced from 1% to 0.5%.
Comments
a.
The Circular seems to clarify that the time of
supply in case of corporate guarantee is the issuance of such guarantee. In
light of this, taxability of guarantees given during service tax regime which
are continuing under GST needs to be evaluated.
b.
Since the valuation is 1% per annum of amount
guaranteed or actual consideration, whichever is higher, the same needs to be
analyzed in cases where the guarantee is either perpetual or do not stipulate
any quantum.
c.
Taxpayers who have claimed refund on account of
export of service by way of corporate guarantee, after 23 October 2023 basis
rule 28(2), will need to evaluate the implication of retrospective amendment.
d.
Since the proviso under Rule 88B for interest
computation is not inserted with retrospective effect, the issue of levy of
interest for past period may be still open considering divergent HC rulings.
No comments:
Post a Comment