Monday, 15 July 2024

Substitution of Bill of Entry - A Little Explored Provision

 This is to update you about Section 46(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 (‘CA 1962’) which talks about reinstatement of Ex-bond Bill of Entry (‘BE’) to In-bond BE. In simple words, an importer can get BE for Home Consumption converted back into BE for Warehousing.

 

Section 46(5)

 

·            The language of the provision is:

 

“If the proper officer is satisfied that the interests of revenue are not prejudicially affected and that there was no fraudulent intention, he may permit substitution of a bill of entry for home consumption for a bill of entry for warehousing or vice versa.”

 

·            Thus, in order to reinstate Ex-bond BE to In-bond BE, following twin conditions must be satisfied:

 

(a)          Interest of revenue is not prejudicially affected; and

(b)         There was no fraudulent intent

 

Practical Usage of Section 46(5)

 

·            Section 46(5) may be used in litigation by importers, inter alia, in following situations:

 

                i.                   Customs in not allowing In-bond BE for certain goods. For example, at some ports, Customs officers have started holding bonding of second-hand goods in MOOWR premises.

 

              ii.                   Where MOOWR license is not granted on frivolous grounds and importer had no option but to file to Ex-bond BE since goods have already arrived at port.

 

            iii.                   Where importer mistakenly files Ex-bond BE but before clearance order decides to substitute it with In-bond BE.

 | Remarks

 

·            Recently, Hon’ble CESTAT allowed reinstatement of Ex-bond BE into In-bond BE in the case of Emami Agrotech Limited v. CC, Customs Appeal No. 75759 of 2023, in certain circumstance.

 

·            We are also working on this route in one peculiar MOOWR case where Department is delaying the grant of license and importer’s goods have already arrived at port.

No comments:

Long-term capital losses available against gains from transfer of depreciable assets

  Recently, the Mumbai ITAT in ACIT v. Reliance Infrastructure Limited ruled in favour of the taxpayer and reaffirmed that the special co...