Bombay HC expresses
discontent over unsatisfactory state of affairs, terming GST regime “not tax
friendly”, while presiding over writ petition seeking grievance redressal
against lack of access to GST portal despite registration; Notes that
petitioner is unable to inter alia file necessary returns, particularly Form
GSTR-3B, thereby attracting late fee for period from October 207 onwards, and
generate E-way bill; HC states, “It is not the business of this Court to grant
such access as is claimed by the petitioner. It is for the authorities to work
out the necessary mechanism and set that in place” while directing authorities
to set up and establish grievance redressal mechanism; Noting that Revenue
could not give a definite answer on whether petitioner’s grievance would be
projected and raised before GST Council or not, HC observes, “A tax like
Goods and Services Tax was highly publicised and termed as popular. We had yet
not seen a celebration of New Tax regime, but that has followed with great hue
and cry. These celebrations mean nothing. The special sessions of Parliament or
special or extraordinary meetings of Council would mean nothing to the
assessees unless they obtain easy access to the website and portals.”; Hopes
that those in charge of implementation and administration of GST law would at
least now wake up and put in place requisite mechanism so as to preserve the
image, prestige and reputation of country, and lists matter on February 16
while noting Allahabad HC’s direction to reopen GST portal in a similar
grievance : Bombay HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment