Mumbai ITAT rules that
payment by Reliance Communication Ltd. (‘assessee’) to non-resident vendors
(based in Australia, Israel, Sweden, Singapore and USA) for supplying software,
not royalty under respective DTAA, holds it as payment for 'copyrighted
article' and not ‘copyright’ itself; Observes that all software license agreements
stipulate that the assessee would be using the software for ‘operation of its
wireless network only’ and it was prevented from utilizing the software for
commercial uses; Further, observes that copyrights in the software were not
transferred to the customers and access to the ‘source codes’ in the software
was not granted to assessee, also there was restriction on copying the
software; Moreover, ITAT observes that in individual supplier's hands (i.e.
Nortel Networks India International Inc. USA, Team Telecom International Ltd.,
Israel, Motorola Inc USA, Alcatel USA International Marketing Inc USA, ZTE
Corporation China and Ericsson AB Sweden), the Courts / Tribunals have held
that sums received by them from assessee for supply of software for wireless
network were not taxable and that the payments could not be termed as royalty;
Cites plethora of rulings including Madras HC ruling in Neyveli Lignite
Corporation Ltd., Delhi HC ruling in Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co.Ltd.,
rejects Revenue’s reliance on Karnataka HC ruling in Samsung, relies on SC
ruling in Pradip J. Mehta to hold that when two views were possible, then the
interpretation in favour of the taxpayer should be adopted:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment