SC
upholds Single Judge bench view of HC, provisions of Standards of Weights and
Measures Act, 1976 (SWM Act, 1976), Standards of Weights and Measures
(Enforcement) Act, 1985 (SWM Act, 1985) and Legal Metrology Act, 2009
(LMA, 2009) inapplicable to 'mineral water' sale in hotels and restaurants at
prices above MRP; Notes HC’s Division Bench observation that Single Judge Bench
judgment to the effect that charging prices in excess of printed MRP does not
violate provisions of SWM Act, shall not be enforceable in respect of
provisions of LMA, 2009 and same needs to be adjudicated in de-novo proceedings
under the new Act; Elucidates that, object of LMA, 2009 is only to do away with
1976 and 1985 Acts and combine provisions into one enactment to make the law
simple and bring in transparency, moreover, despite changes made by
46thConstitutional amendment introducing Article 366(29A), position qua ‘sale’
in LMA 2009 / Rules remains exactly the same; Remarks, definition of “sale”
contained in both Acts demonstrates that composite indivisible agreements for
supply of services and food and drinks would not come within the purview of
either enactment since the object is something quite different; SC also rejects
Revenue’s reliance on definition of ‘institutional consumer’ contained in Rules
and contention that hotels would be under the coverage of LMA, 2009 : SC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment